Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcKay, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCarty, Catherine A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-22T09:05:00Z
dc.date.available2014-05-22T09:05:00Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-11-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcKay, R., McCarty, C. A., & Taylor, H. R. (2001). Diabetic retinopathy in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project. Focus on Diabetic Retinopathy,.8(2), 44-45.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33443
dc.descriptionPermission for this item cannot be attained from the publisher and therefore the item must remain unavailable.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to establish the prevalence, severity, and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in a representative sample of Victorian residents aged >= 40 years.A population-based cluster sampling method was used to recruit 4,744 participants (86% participation rate) between 1992 and 1996. Nine suburban Melbourne clusters and four rural Victorian clusters were randomly selected. A private household census was conducted to identify permanent household members aged >= 40 years who were classified as eligible residents. At locally established test sites, participants provided a detailed medical and personal history and underwent an ocular examination including dilated funduscopy and fundus photography. The interview included specific questioning about whether participants had ever been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and the year in which such a diagnosis was made. Participants with previously diagnosed diabetes were also asked if and when their last dilated fundus examination had been conducted and who performed the examination. Two 30° fields of the fundus were photographed in each eye; one centered on the optic disk and the other centered on the fovea. Levels of diabetic retinopathy in people with previously diagnosed diabetes were defined, according to the Academy of Ophthalmology in the United States, as mild nonproliferative, moderate nonproliferative, severe nonproliferative, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. All participants at rural test sites were asked to provide a finger-prick blood sample to measure glycosylated hemoglobin (HbAlc) percentages. Glaucoma status was evaluated by a consensus panel comprised of six ophthalmologists, including two glaucoma specialists. This panel determined glaucoma status on the basis of Humphrey visual fields and photographs of the optic disk. Presenting visual acuity was determined with an Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 4-meter chart. Myopia was defined as a best-corrected minus spherical equivalent of > -0.5 D in either eye.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.subjectCERAen_US
dc.subjectophthalmologyen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
dc.subjecteye researchen_US
dc.subjectvisionen_US
dc.subjectvisual healthen_US
dc.titleDiabetic retinopathy in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Projecten_US
dc.typeJournal (Paginated)en_US
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Revieweden_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMedicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences: Centre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentSchool of Medicine: Ophthalmologyen_US
melbourne.publication.statusPublisheden_US
melbourne.source.titleFocus on Diabetic Retinopathyen_US
melbourne.source.volumevol.8en_US
melbourne.source.issueno.2en_US
melbourne.source.pages44-45en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorMcCarty, Catherine
melbourne.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record