Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCarty, Cathy A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFu, Cara L. H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-22T09:05:35Z
dc.date.available2014-05-22T09:05:35Z
dc.date.issued1999-09en_US
dc.date.submitted2006-11-22en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcCarty, C. A. and Fu, C. L. H. and Taylor, H. R. (1999). Epidemiology of ocular trauma in Australia. Ophthalmology, 106(9), 1847-1852.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33446
dc.descriptionPublisher's version is restricted access in accordance with the publisher's policy.en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To describe the prevalence and risk factors of ocular trauma in a representative sample of Australians aged 40 and over who reside in the state of Victoria.Design: Population-based cross-sectional study.Participants: Australians aged 40 years and older living in Victoria.Methods: Cluster, stratified sampling was used to identify permanent residents for a population-based study of eye disease. A standardized examination that included visual acuity and information about ocular trauma was conducted.Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported history of ocular trauma and circumstances surrounding the events.Results: A total of 3271 (83% of eligible) Melbourne residents and 1473 (92% of eligible) rural residents were examined. The overall rate of eye injury history in Victoria was 21.1% (95% confidence limits [CL] 19.6%, 22.5%). Men were far more likely than women to have ever experienced an eye injury (34.2% versus 9.9%), and rural men were more likely than Melbourne men to have ever had an eye injury (42.1% versus 30.5%). The workplace accounted for the majority of eye injuries (60%), followed by the home (24%). The location with the highest percent of people reporting the use of eye protection at the time of the injury was the workplace (18.5%); the workplace accounted for the lowest rate of hospitalization (4.9%). The industry with highest cumulative rate of eye injuries was communication (14 per 1000), whereas the highest occupation-specific cumulative rates of eye injury were recorded for tradespersons (18 per 1000).Conclusions: Although ocular trauma is usually not associated with bilateral vision impairment, it is a major public health problem in Australia. Rural men, people engaged in hammering or sport, and those in the trades are at highest risk and require specific, targeted, prevention messages.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://tinyurl.com/yh65gxqen_US
dc.subjectCERAen_US
dc.subjectophthalmologyen_US
dc.subjectCentre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
dc.subjecteye researchen_US
dc.subjectvisionen_US
dc.subjectvisual healthen_US
dc.titleEpidemiology of ocular trauma in Australiaen_US
dc.typeJournal (Paginated)en_US
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Revieweden_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMedicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences: Centre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentSchool of Medicine: Ophthalmologyen_US
melbourne.publication.statusPublisheden_US
melbourne.source.titleOphthalmologyen_US
melbourne.source.month09en_US
melbourne.source.volumevol.106en_US
melbourne.source.issueno.9en_US
melbourne.source.pages1847-1852en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorMcCarty, Catherine
melbourne.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record