Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWeih, LeAnn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMukesh, Nanjanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCarty, Catherine A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh R.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWeih, L. M., Mukesh, N., McCarty, C. A., & Taylor, H. R. (2001). Prevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma: results from the Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology, 108(11), 1966-1972.en_US
dc.descriptionPublisher’s version is restricted access in accordance with the Elsevier policy.The original publication is available at
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To determine the prevalence and investigate predictors of open-angle glaucoma in Victoria, Australia Design: Two-site, population-based cross-sectional study. Participants: Permanent residents aged 40 years and older at recruitment from 1992 through 1996. Methods: A cluster-stratified random sample of 4744 participants from two cohorts, urban and rural, participated. Participants completed a standardized interview regarding demographic, lifestyle, and medical characteristics and a dilated eye examination including measurement of intraocular pressure, visual fields, cup-to-disc ratios, and paired stereo photography of the optic discs. A consensus panel of six ophthalmologists determined glaucoma diagnosis. Main Outcome Measure: Diagnosis of glaucoma (possible, probable, definite). Results: The prevalence of possible glaucoma cases was 1.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60, 1.7), of probable cases was 0.70% (95% CI, 0.39, 1.0), and of definite cases was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.4, 2.2). There was a significant increase in glaucoma prevalence with age across all definitions, but there was no difference in age-standardized rates between genders. A total of 60% of probable and definite glaucoma cases were undiagnosed before this study. Adjusted for age, the strongest risk factor for glaucoma was a positive family history of glaucoma (odds ratio, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6, 5.3). Glaucoma patients who had not attended an eye care provider in the last 2 years were eight times (95% CI, 3.2, 20.4) more likely to have undiagnosed disease. Conclusions: These results support the importance of the genetic or familial basis of many glaucoma cases and highlight the need to develop appropriate techniques to screen for undiagnosed disease.en_US
dc.publisherElsevier (American Academy of Ophthalmology)en_US
dc.subjectCentre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
dc.subjecteye researchen_US
dc.subjectvisual healthen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and predictors of open-angle glaucoma : results from the Visual Impairment Projecten_US
dc.typeJournal (Paginated)en_US
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Revieweden_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMedicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences: Centre for Eye Research Australiaen_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentSchool of Medicine: Ophthalmologyen_US
melbourne.contributor.authorWEIH, LEANN
melbourne.contributor.authorMUKESH, Bickol
melbourne.contributor.authorMcCarty, Catherine
melbourne.contributor.authorTaylor, Hugh
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is currently not available from this repository

Files in this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record