Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHES, DOMINIQUEen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-22T09:27:54Z
dc.date.available2014-05-22T09:27:54Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.date.submitted2008-01-17en_US
dc.identifier.citationHes, D. (2007). Effectiveness of ‘green’ building rating tools: a review of performance. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 3(4), 143-152.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/33565
dc.description© 2007 Dr. Dominique Hesen_US
dc.description.abstractIn the context of the built environment this paper presents an approach using a series of nine criteria for investigating the effectiveness of building rating tools. The ability to measure a building’s performance using rating tools is one way of looking at the integration of sustainability objectives into the built form. The term effectiveness, as defined in this paper, is not limited to demonstrating improved environmentally performance but also the long term effectiveness of the rating tools application and usability. Further, it covers the ability for the rating systems to provide the outcomes expected by those using the tools. It was found that though rating tools tend to look primarily at environmental sustainability, reports covered broader outcomes such as social sustainability, productivity improvements, comfort gains and costs savings. Effectiveness therefore also encompasses these other issues particularly as these are often used as arguments for the design and construction of ‘green’ buildings, and the use of rating tools as a support for the process. The research method uses existing publicly available reports on the performance of buildings which have been rated over the last 10 years. This data is then used to discuss effectiveness based on the criteria identified by the research. It shows that the rated buildings do seem to have significant reductions in energy and water consumption; there is evidence that employees are more comfortable and there is increased productivity. Their effectiveness does not seem as high in other areas though, as the tools do seem to be both costly and bureaucratic in their implementation, and seem to be less geared to supporting the dynamic nature of building design and development, needing to be more proactive in support of innovation. The paper closes with a brief discussion of the future developments occurring internationally, particularly how these are addressing some of the less effective parts of the tools. The paper closed by posing the question whether rating tools can lead to a sustainable built environment when the tools are predicated on increasing efficiency and efficiency is limited and only part of the solution.en_US
dc.formatapplication/pdfen_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherCommon Grounden_US
dc.subjectrating toolsen_US
dc.subjectbuilding sustainabilityen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of ‘green’ building rating tools: a review of performanceen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
melbourne.peerreviewPeer Revieweden_US
melbourne.affiliationThe University of Melbourneen_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentArchitecture, Building & Planningen_US
melbourne.publication.statusPublisheden_US
melbourne.source.titleInternational Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainabilityen_US
melbourne.source.volume3en_US
melbourne.source.issue4en_US
melbourne.source.pages143-152en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorHes, Dominique
melbourne.accessrightsOpen Access


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record