University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • Arts
  • School of Social and Political Sciences
  • School of Social and Political Sciences - Research Publications
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • Arts
  • School of Social and Political Sciences
  • School of Social and Political Sciences - Research Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    A comparative analysis of political email lists

    Thumbnail
    Download
    A Comparative Analysis of Political Email Lists (638.1Kb)

    Citations
    Altmetric
    Author
    CHEN, PETER
    Date
    2004
    Source Title
    Proceedings, Australian Electronic Governance Conference 2004
    Publisher
    Centre for Public Policy
    University of Melbourne Author/s
    CHEN, PETER
    Affiliation
    Arts: Education Policy and Management
    Arts: Centre for Public Policy
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Conference Paper
    Citations
    Chen, P. (2004). A comparative analysis of political email lists. In, Proceedings, Australian Electronic Governance Conference 2004, University of Melbourne.
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/33814
    Abstract
    Utilising three similar, but slightly different Australian general political email discussion lists, this paper examines the degree to which these lists, as a new form of 'public sphere' (Dahlberg, 2001) can be seen to undertake, or fulfil, the 'traditional' functions of political associations (formal and informal),specifically: political socalisation, aggregation, and mobilisation. Using a combination of content analysis, observation, and network analysis to examine the content of messages travelling over these lists and the social community they embody, this paper concludes that these lists do fulfil important political socialisation functions, but do not provide the means by which political interlocutors can turn this social bonding and education into practical political expression. While each list had significant similarities, it appears that important "bracing" factors lead to the success or otherwise of lists as lively places for debate. In particular, the role of moderation and promotion is critical in the establishment of political discussion lists that develop enough 'critical mass' to sustain a community of interest large enough to appear self-replicating. The research points to the important relationship between online political forms of expression and extant political organisations, structures, and institutions for further research.
    Keywords
    Internet; politics; email; lists; social networking

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • School of Social and Political Sciences - Research Publications [1130]
    • Melbourne Graduate School of Education - Research Publications [1597]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors