A benchmark for politeness

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Citations
    Altmetric
    Author
    Allan, Keith
    Date
    2014
    Publisher
    University of Melbourne
    Affiliation
    School of Languages and Linguistics - Conferences
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/40955
    Description
     

    ©2014 Keith Allan

     

    This paper was presented at the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2013, at the University of Melbourne. All papers in the volume have been double blind peer-reviewed. Volume edited by Lauren Gawne and Jill Vaughan.

     

    ISBN: 978-0-9941507-0-7

     
    Abstract
    (Im)politeness is never a depersonalized, decontextualized absolute but always a perception or judgment of appropriate behaviour on a given occasion – what one expects oneself and others to do in a particular social interaction. Nonetheless it is normal for most tabooed words and phrases to be castigated in dictionaries as ‘coarse’, ‘obscene’, ‘insulting’, ‘vulgar’, ‘profane’, ‘taboo’, ‘impolite’ and ‘offensive’, i.e. dysphemistic. The benchmark for such judgements, and more generally for (im)politeness within Anglo communities, is what Allan & Burridge (1991) called the middle class politeness criterion (MCPC). Following a discussion of (im)politeness theories and hypotheses about face management, (cultural) scripts and habitus, the MCPC is closely examined, explained, and tested in the course of examining some texts. The essay concludes with proposals to resolve the apparent limitations of the MCPC.
    Keywords
    appropriate behaviour, cooperativeness, face, habitus, impoliteness, politeness, rapport management, social identity, social interaction

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Collections