On restrictions on the use of non-restrictive infinitival relative clauses in English

Citations
Altmetric
Author
Akiyama, TakanobuDate
2014Publisher
University of MelbourneUniversity of Melbourne Author/s
AKIYAMA, TOMOYASUAffiliation
School of Languages and Linguistics - ConferencesMetadata
Show full item recordAccess Status
Open AccessDescription
©2014 Takanobu Akiyama
This paper was presented at the 44th Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, 2013, at the University of Melbourne. All papers in the volume have been double blind peer-reviewed. Volume edited by Lauren Gawne and Jill Vaughan.
ISBN: 978-0-9941507-0-7
Abstract
This paper deals with non-restrictive infinitival relative clauses (NIRCs) in English (e.g. An independent review, to be funded by the health authority, has been commissioned). The purpose of this paper is twofold: (i) to give an accurate description of the semantic properties of the NIRC on the basis of the British National Corpus, and (ii) to elucidate restrictions on the use of this construction. My corpus-based approach will clarify four types of shades of meaning expressed by this construction are equal to those expressed by IS TO construction (i.e. plan, necessity or appropriateness, future in the past, and possibility). I will stress that NIRCs are used only when they have one notional category (i.e. notional subject/object), which is highly likely to be a notional subject of the infinitive, and denote one of the shades of meaning rather than causality.
Keywords
non-restrictive clauses; infinitival relative clauses; meaning of to-infinitives; British National CorpusExport Reference in RIS Format
Endnote
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
Refworks
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References
