Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBLOM, MICHELLE
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-07T01:21:51Z
dc.date.available2014-11-07T01:21:51Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/42226
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents some preliminary work toward the development of an argumentative interpreter for Golog programs. Traditional Golog interpreters are not designed to find the most preferred executions of a program from the perspective of an agent. Existing techniques that optimise the interpretation of Golog programs suffer from either a lack of exibility in how preference may be expressed or require the consideration of all program executions. The presented work combines the use of argumentation to compare executions relative to a set of general comparison criteria, and the theory behind informed search techniques to reduce the cost of the search process. The use of this argumentative informed search in the interpretation of ConGolog programs (with true concurrency), and its potential to find a program execution that is the most preferred by a collection of agents, is also discussed.en_US
dc.titleOptimising the interpretation of Golog programs with argumentationen_US
melbourne.affiliation.departmentComputing and Information Systems
melbourne.affiliation.facultyEngineering
melbourne.publication.statusPublisheden_US
melbourne.source.locationconferenceBath, UKen_US
dc.description.sourcedateconference2008
dc.description.sourcetitleSixth European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems: EUMAS 2008en_US
melbourne.elementsidNA
melbourne.contributor.authorBlom, Michelle
melbourne.accessrightsOnly available to University of Melbourne staff and students, login required


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record