Related plants tend to share pollinators and herbivores, but strength of phylogenetic signal varies among plant families
Loading...
Download
Associated Records
File Licence
Editors
Date
2020-05
Source Title
New Phytologist
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
WILEY
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
School of BioSciences
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Cirtwill, A. R., Dalla Riva, G. V., Baker, N. J., Ohlsson, M., Norstrom, I., Wohlfarth, I. -M., Thia, J. A. & Stouffer, D. B. (2020). Related plants tend to share pollinators and herbivores, but strength of phylogenetic signal varies among plant families. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 226 (3), pp.909-920. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16420.
Access Status
Open Access
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
Related plants are often hypothesized to interact with similar sets of pollinators and herbivores, but this idea has only mixed empirical support. This may be because plant families vary in their tendency to share interaction partners.
We quantify overlap of interaction partners for all pairs of plants in 59 pollination and 11 herbivory networks based on the numbers of shared and unshared interaction partners (thereby capturing both proportional and absolute overlap). We test for relationships between phylogenetic distance and partner overlap within each network; whether these relationships varied with the composition of the plant community; and whether well-represented plant families showed different relationships.
Across all networks, more closely related plants tended to have greater overlap. The strength of this relationship within a network was unrelated to the composition of the network's plant component, but, when considered separately, different plant families showed different relationships between phylogenetic distance and overlap of interaction partners.
The variety of relationships between phylogenetic distance and partner overlap in different plant families probably reflects a comparable variety of ecological and evolutionary processes. Considering factors affecting particular species-rich groups within a community could be the key to understanding the distribution of interactions at the network level.