Effects of positive human contact during gestation on the behaviour, physiology and reproductive performance of sows
Loading...
Citations
Web of Science:
Altmetric:
Altmetric::
Download
Associated Records
Authors
File Licence
Editors
Date
2021-01-01
Source Title
Animals
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
Veterinary Clinical Sciences
Veterinary Biosciences
Veterinary Biosciences
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Hayes, M. E., Hemsworth, L. M., Morrison, R. S., Butler, K. L., Rice, M., Rault, J. L. & Hemsworth, P. H. (2021). Effects of positive human contact during gestation on the behaviour, physiology and reproductive performance of sows. Animals, 11 (1), pp.1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010214.
Access Status
Open Access
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
Previous positive interactions with humans may ameliorate the stress response of farm animals to aversive routine practices such as painful or stressful procedures, particularly those associated with stockpeople. We studied the effects of positive handling by providing younger (parity 1-2) and older (parity 3-8) sows housed in pens of fifteen (n = 24 pens in total) with either positive human contact (+HC) or routine human contact (control) during gestation. The +HC treatment involved a familiar stockperson patting and scratching sows and was imposed at a pen-level for 2 min daily. Measurements studied included behavioural, physiological and productivity variables. The +HC sows showed reduced avoidance of the stockperson conducting pregnancy testing and vaccination in the home pens, however the behavioural and cortisol responses of sows in a standard unfamiliar human approach test did not differ. There were no effects of +HC on aggression between sows, serum cortisol or serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations during gestation, or on the behavioural and cortisol response to being moved to farrowing crates. There were also no effects of +HC on the maternal responsiveness of sows, farrowing rate or the number of piglets born alive, stillborn or weaned. Sows in the +HC pens reduced their physical interaction with the stockpeople imposing the treatment after 2 weeks, which suggests the sows may have habituated to the novel or possible rewarding elements of the handling treatment. This experiment shows that regular positive interaction with stockpeople does reduce sows' fear of stockpeople, but does not always confer stress resilence.