Promoting Innovation or Exacerbating Inequality? Laboratory Federalism and Australian Age Discrimination Law
Loading...
Citations
Altmetric:
Altmetric::
Download
Associated Records
Authors
File Licence
Editors
Date
2023-09-01
Source Title
Federal Law Review
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
Melbourne Law School
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Blackham, A. (2023). Promoting Innovation or Exacerbating Inequality? Laboratory Federalism and Australian Age Discrimination Law. Federal Law Review, 51 (3), pp.347-371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X231187971.
Access Status
Open Access
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
Abstract
According to laboratory federalism, federal systems can promote governmental innovation and experimentation, while containing the risks of innovation to only one jurisdiction. However, it is unclear whether these benefits are realised in practice and whether states are actually effective ‘laboratories’. This article evaluates the extent to which laboratory federalism is occurring in practice, focusing on a case study of age discrimination law in Australia. Drawing on related ideas of democratic experimentalism; legal doctrinal analysis of age discrimination law in the Australian states and territories, and at the federal level; and qualitative expert interviews with 66 Australian respondents, I map the potential and limits of laboratory federalism in advancing age equality. I argue that, in this particular context, the benefits of experimentation may be outweighed by the resulting difficulties of enforcing age discrimination law, exacerbating inequality in practice. The federal structure has led to a confused and confusing patchwork of legal regulation. There is therefore a need for stronger federal structures to facilitate mutual learning and better realise the benefits of laboratory federalism.