Recruitment and Retention of Children in Behavioral Health Risk Factor Studies: REACH Strategies
Loading...
Citations
Scopus:
Altmetric:
Altmetric::
Download
Associated Records
Authors
File Licence
Editors
Date
2014-10-01
Source Title
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
SPRINGER
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
University General
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Schoeppe, S., Oliver, M., Badland, H. M., Burke, M. & Duncan, M. J. (2014). Recruitment and Retention of Children in Behavioral Health Risk Factor Studies: REACH Strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21 (5), pp.794-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9347-5.
Access Status
Open Access
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children are a common target group in behavioral health research. Yet their recruitment into community setting studies poses challenges to researchers and little guidance exists on recruitment and retention methods. PURPOSE: This study aims to present successful strategies for the recruitment and retention of children into behavioral health risk factor studies. METHOD: Firstly, a literature search in various databases was undertaken for papers published 1990-2012, focusing on recruitment and retention methods used in community-based studies with children aged 3-18 years. Secondly, a Delphi study was conducted in 2012 with 27 international experts in the fields of child-related behavioral health risk factors to gather expertise and consensus on successful recruitment and retention strategies applicable in children. RESULTS: The literature review and Delphi study yielded a set of successful child recruitment and retention strategies, and examples for implementation. These are presented as strategies to Recruit, Engage and retAin Children in behavioral Health risk factor studies (REACH). Recognized strategies for successful recruitment and retention included building trustful relationships between researchers and study partners, parents, and children; having project champions; optimizing consent and follow-up procedures; offering incentives to study partners, children, and parents; minimizing participant burden; and designing feasible studies with cohesive research teams. CONCLUSION: Using multiple REACH strategies is most promising for maximizing response rates and minimizing attrition of children in cross-sectional, longitudinal, and behavioral intervention studies in community settings such as schools, child care centers, and other youth-related organizations. Researchers can select the most suitable strategies based on their specific study design and requirements.