Task-sensitive semantic-visual alignment of motion schema during incremental Mandarin sentence comprehension
Loading...
Citations
Altmetric:
Altmetric::
Download
Associated Records
File Licence
Editors
Date
2026
Source Title
Language and Cognition
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
School of Languages and Linguistics
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Wang, M. & Zhao, H. (2026). Task-sensitive semantic-visual alignment of motion schema during incremental Mandarin sentence comprehension. Language and Cognition, 18, https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2026.10120.
Access Status
Open Access
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
Language comprehension involves dynamically integrating linguistic input into coherent event representations. A common approach to investigating this process has been to examine behavioural congruency effects between linguistic and visual information. However, it remains unclear under what conditions these effects emerge and whether they reflect embodied processing or alternative cognitive mechanisms. The present study examined semantic-visual alignment of motion schema during incremental processing of Mandarin motion sentences, focusing on whether congruency effects are modulated by task demands and visual probe regions. 149 native Mandarin speakers completed either a self-paced sentence-diagram verification task or a self-paced sentence-diagram viewing task. In both tasks, participants processed segmented Chinese motion sentences, while schematic diagrams were presented either after the directional verb (e.g., jìn, ‘into’) or the landmark (e.g., bàn-gōng-shì, ‘office’). Results revealed overall congruency effects across tasks and diagram regions. Crucially, effects were stronger in the verification task than in the viewing task but remained stable across diagram regions. These findings suggest that semantic-visual alignment is sensitive to task demands but does not necessarily become stronger as the sentence unfolds. These congruency effects are open to both embodied and amodal semantic interpretations and are therefore not uniquely diagnostic of embodied processing.