Caring decisions: The development of a written resource for parents facing end-of-life decisions
Loading...
Download
Associated Records
Authors
File Licence
Editors
Date
2015-11-01
Source Title
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
Melbourne Authors
Affiliation
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
Document Type
Journal Article
Subject Code
Citation
Xafis, V., Gillam, L., Hynson, J., Sullivan, J., Cossich, M. & Wilkinson, D. (2015). Caring decisions: The development of a written resource for parents facing end-of-life decisions. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18 (11), pp.945-955. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2015.0048.
Access Status
Open Access
Access URL
Open Access URL
Open Access at PMC
Linked Resource URL
NHMRC Grant Code
ARC Grant Code
Description
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Written resources in adult intensive care have been shown to benefit families facing end of life (EoL) decisions. There are few resources for parents making EoL decisions for their child and no existing resources addressing ethical issues. The Caring Decisions handbook and website were developed to fill these gaps. AIM: We discuss the development of the resources, modification after reviewer feedback and findings from initial pilot implementation. DESIGN: A targeted literature review-to identify resources and factors that impact on parental EoL decision-making; development phase-guided by the literature and the researchers' expertise; consultation process-comprised a multi-disciplinary panel of experts and parents; pilot evaluation study-hard-copy handbook was distributed as part of routine care at an Australian Children's Hospital. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Twelve experts and parents formed the consultation panel. Eight parents of children with life-limiting conditions and clinicians were interviewed in the pilot study. RESULTS: Numerous factors supporting/impeding EoL decisions were identified. Caring Decisions addressed issues identified in the literature and by the multidisciplinary research team. The consultation panel provided overwhelmingly positive feedback. Pilot study parents found the resources helpful and comforting. Most clinicians viewed the resources as very beneficial to parents and identified them as ideal for training purposes. CONCLUSIONS: The development of the resources addressed many of the gaps in existing resources. The consultation process and the pilot study suggest these resources could be of significant benefit to parents and clinicians.