TY  - JOUR
AU  - Drinkwater, J
AU  - Stanley, N
AU  - Szilassy, E
AU  - Larkins, C
AU  - Hester, M
AU  - Feder, G
Y2  - 2020/12/21
Y1  - 2017/06
SN  - 0960-1643
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/11343/257132
AB  - BACKGROUND: Domestic violence and abuse (DVA) and child safeguarding are interlinked problems, impacting on all family members. Documenting in electronic patient records (EPRs) is an important part of managing these families. Current evidence and guidance, however, treats DVA and child safeguarding separately. This does not reflect the complexity clinicians face when documenting both issues in one family. AIM: To explore how and why general practice clinicians document DVA in families with children. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative interview study using vignettes with GPs and practice nurses (PNs) in England. METHOD: Semi-structured telephone interviews with 54 clinicians (42 GPs and 12 PNs) were conducted across six sites in England. Data were analysed thematically using a coding frame incorporating concepts from the literature and emerging themes. RESULTS: Most clinicians recognised DVA and its impact on child safeguarding, but struggled to work out the best way to document it. They described tensions among the different roles of the EPR: a legal document; providing continuity of care; information sharing to improve safety; and a patient-owned record. This led to strategies to hide information, so that it was only available to other clinicians. CONCLUSION: Managing DVA in families with children is complex and challenging for general practice clinicians. National integrated guidance is urgently needed regarding how clinicians should manage the competing roles of the EPR, while maintaining safety of the whole family, especially in the context of online EPRs and patient access.
LA  - eng
PB  - Royal College of General Practitioners
T1  - Juggling confidentiality and safety: a qualitative study of how general practice clinicians document domestic violence in families with children.
DO  - 10.3399/bjgp17X689353
IS  - British Journal of General Practice
VL  - 67
IS  - 659
SP  - e437-e444
L1  - /bitstream/handle/11343/257132/PMC5442959.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
ER  -