TY  - JOUR
AU  - Monty, JP
AU  - Hutchins, N
AU  - Ng, HCH
AU  - Marusic, I
AU  - Chong, MS
Y2  - 2014/05/22
Y1  - 2009/08/10
SN  - 0022-1120
UR  - http://hdl.handle.net/11343/32989
AB  - The extent or existence of similarities between fully developed turbulent pipes and channels, and in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers has come into question in recent years. This is in contrast to the traditionally accepted view that, upon appropriate normalization, all three flows can be regarded as the same in the near-wall region. In this paper, the authors aim to provide clarification of this issue through streamwise velocity measurements in these three flows with carefully matched Reynolds number and measurement resolution. Results show that mean statistics in the near-wall region collapse well. However, the premultiplied energy spectra of streamwise velocity fluctuations show marked structural differences that cannot be explained by scaling arguments. It is concluded that, while similarities exist at these Reynolds numbers, one should exercise caution when drawing comparisons between the three shear flows, even near the wall.
LA  - English
PB  - CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
KW  - turbulent pipes
KW  - canonical wall-bounded shear flows
KW  - Reynolds number
T1  - A comparison of turbulent pipe, channel and boundary layer flows
DO  - 10.1017/S0022112009007423
IS  - Journal of Fluid Mechanics
VL  - 632
SP  - 431-442
L1  - /bitstream/handle/11343/32989/294701_comparison%20of%20turbulent.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
ER  -